Resource library
Filter
-
Creating dialogic spaces: developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment and review
Joan Woodhouse & Phil Wood (2022)
Studies in Higher Education, 47:3, 643–655
-
Supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ reasons for not giving timely feedback
Bahtilla, M. (2022)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
-
The challenges and trade-offs of supporting doctoral student writing: A case study of faculty experiences
Holzweiss, P. (2022)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
-
Doctoral writing and remote supervision: What the literature tells us
Geurin, C. and Aithison, C. (2021)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(6): 624–634.
-
Understanding suicidality and reasons for living amongst Doctoral Researchers: A thematic analysis of qualitative U‑DOC survey data
Hazell, C., Berry, C., Niven, J. and Mackenzie, J‑M. (2021)
Counselling Psychotherapy Research, 21: 757–767
-
‘Only two pages’ of Luxembourg PM’s university thesis were not plagiarised
Henley, J. (2021)
The Guardian, 27th October
-
Understanding Supervisory Practices: Commonalities and Differences in Ways of Working with Doctoral Writers
Rachael Cayley (2020)
Rédactologie 30, 1–18
-
Writing together to foster wellbeing: doctoral writing groups as spaces of wellbeing
Kim Beasy, S. Emery, L. Dyer, B. Coleman, D. Bywaters, T. Garrad, J. Crawford, K. Swarts & S. Jahangiri (2020)
Higher Education Research & Development, 39:6, 1091–1105
-
The relationship between reading, thinking and writing: the literature review component of a doctoral confirmation proposal
Bitchener, J. (2018)
In S. Carter and D. Laurs (eds/) Developing Research Writing. London, Routledge: 9–16.
-
Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities: Preparing research supervisors to teach writing Cally Guerin
Guerin C., Walker R., Aitchison C., Laming M., Padmanabhan M. C., & James B. (2017)
Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 11(1), A88-A103