Resource library
Filter
-
Developments in the Doctoral Examination in the UK
A study of the doctoral examination policies of 127 UK Higher Education Institutions
-
Supervisor perspectives on the ‘end-stage’ of the doctoral examination process
Dally, K. Holbrook A., Lovat, T. and Fairbairn, H. (2022)
Higher Education Research and Development, 41(2): 315–329.
-
‘Smile and nod’ or more? Reassessing the role of the silent supervisor in the doctoral viva
Kumar, V., Kaur, A., Sharmini, S. and Noman, M. (2022)
International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17: 263–277
-
PhD orals from the convenors’ perspective: implications for academics and candidates
Kumar, V., Kaur, A. and Sanderson, L. (2022)
International Journal for Academic Development
-
The PhD viva ritual: a critical autobiographical account
Morgan, D. (2022)
In R. Twinley and G. Letherby (eds.) The Doctoral Journey as an Emotional, Embodied, Political Experience. London, Routledge: 127–133
-
Across time and space: Examiner and candidate experiences of online doctoral vivas
Wisker, G., Highman, L., Spronken-Smith, R. and Waghorne, J. (2022)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
-
International examiners’ participation of the Viva: a ritual or an actual indicator of research quality?
Nir., A. and Bogler, R. (2021)
Quality Assurance in Education Vol. 29 No. 2/3, pp. 183–197
-
‘Only two pages’ of Luxembourg PM’s university thesis were not plagiarised
Henley, J. (2021)
The Guardian, 27th October
-
Institutional and supervisory support for the Thesis by Publication
Mason, S.,Morris, J. and Merga, M. (2021)
Australian Journal of Education, 65(1): 55–72
-
A Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors (2nd Edition)
Taylor, S., Kiley M. and Humphrey, R. (2018)
London, Routledge